Reading Books Might Make You Dumber
Reading isn’t the problem. Passive consumption is. Why books can quietly isolate you and kill real thinking if you’re not careful.
Throughout this piece, I use the term “high-bandwidth mavericks.” If you’re more familiar with the language of giftedness or gifted individuals, you can mentally substitute that framing here. I don’t find the label myself accurate, but the underlying experience overlaps more than the terminology suggests.
There is this persistent idea that reading books automatically makes you smarter, more thoughtful, more informed. But if you actually look at how people engage with books today, that assumption starts to fall apart pretty quickly. Reading has become less of an active process and more of a passive habit, a way to consume information without doing anything meaningful with it. It looks productive on the surface, but in many cases it is just a more socially accepted form of distraction.
The real issue is not the medium itself, but what people do with it. Most reading today is not followed by discussion, application, or even proper reflection. It is information going in without anything coming out. You sit there, absorb words, and move on. That is not thinking. That is not learning. It is just accumulation. And accumulation without processing is closer to hoarding than it is to intelligence.
What gets overlooked is that thinking has never depended on writing in the first place. Long before books were common, people developed, refined, and passed on complex ideas through conversation, storytelling, and shared experience. That process was inherently active and progressive. You had to engage, respond, challenge, and build on ideas in real time. That is a very different level of cognitive involvement compared to silently reading a finished, polished narrative.
Even the parts we admire in great writing often come from something else entirely. The reason certain books feel powerful is not because they are written, but because they simulate speech. They feel like someone is talking to you, guiding you through a line of thought. The strength lies in the underlying thinking and communication, not in the written format itself. Writing is just a tool that captures that process, not the source of it.
There is also an uncomfortable angle to all of this. Reading is often treated as an intellectual activity, but in practice it can be deeply isolating. You are alone, absorbing someone else’s ideas, without friction or challenge. Whether it is a phone screen or a physical book does not really change that dynamic. You are still removing yourself from interaction, from debate, from real-time feedback. The format feels different, but the behavior is the same.
On top of that, writing allows ideas to be packaged in a fixed, controlled form. A book presents a complete perspective that cannot respond to you, cannot adapt, and cannot be questioned in the moment. That makes it incredibly effective for spreading consistent narratives, but not necessarily for developing independent thinking. Without active engagement, it becomes very easy to accept, repeat, and move on.
A more honest way to look at reading is this: it is just one input channel. It is not inherently superior to conversation, reflection, or direct experience. In fact, without those other elements, it quickly becomes shallow. Real understanding comes from working with ideas, not just receiving them. That means questioning, discussing, applying, and sometimes even abandoning what you just read.
Personally, I notice this every time I pick up a book. I rarely move through it from start to finish without interruption. Not because I lack discipline, but because the moment something interesting appears, it triggers a chain of thoughts that feels more valuable than continuing to read. If I ignore that and keep going, the ideas fade. The reading continues, but the thinking stops. And at that point, what is the actual benefit?
So the problem is not that books are bad. The problem is that most people use them in a way that turns them into dead ends. Reading without output, without challenge, without interaction, does not make you sharper. It makes you comfortable. And comfort, especially intellectual comfort, is rarely where real growth happens.
For more information on NEXUS, the NEXUS Werkstatt in Berlin, our 1:1 sessions, transmissions, books and other items, please visit our website nexuswerkstatt.com, or reach out directly.